Players / ABS ranking / Rui Francisco

Rui Francisco
ObipadelLda_0127124120Licence 28970TieSports #277012+45Level 6
FPP ranking#5875published best #5875
FPP points612 valid results
Published record1–420% wins
5matches
1wins
4losses
4partners
3entries
0career podiums
Ranking history
0 seasons · published annual bestThere is not enough historical data yet to draw a trend.
Match history
5 matches found in published draws| Date | Tournament | Partner | Opponents | Round | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Jun15:15 | I Open Padel Factory CarregadoMasculinos 5 | Luis Lopes | João RaposoAndré Moniz | Round of 16 | Loss | 7-5 6-1 |
| 4 Jun13:30 | 2º Open WOW PadelM5-QP | Ricardo Oliveira | Ricardo Marçalo CardosoÉlson Teles | Round of 32 | Loss | 6-1 6-3 |
| 4 Jun10:00 | 2º Open WOW PadelM5-Qualy | Ricardo Oliveira | Tomás CoelhoTiago Barros | Quarter-finals | Winwalkover | FC |
| 30 Apr18:30 | Leiria Master PadelQuali M6 | Hugo Pereira | Gonçalo SantosGabriel Carvalho | Round of 64 | Loss | 6-2 6-2 |
| 12 Mar18:30 | III CPC Padel CupM6-Quali | João Figueiredo | Diego LeoneHenrique Recto | Round of 32 | Loss | 7-6(4) 4-6 3-10 |
Tournament entries
3 published entries| Tournament | Partner | Category | Seed | Pair points | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Open Padel Factory Carregado19 Jun | Luis Lopes | Masculinos 5 | #19 | 70.01 | Pending |
| 2º Open WOW Padel3 Jun | Ricardo Oliveira | Masculinos 5 | #32 | 99.75 | Confirmed |
| Leiria Master Padel30 Apr | Hugo Pereira | Masculinos 6 | #97 | 18.76 | Pending |
Results with points
10 records in the public ledger| Tournament | Partner | Draw | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Open Carregado by AXIANS21 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 5 - M5-QP | Round of 16 | 9.75 |
| II Open WOW Padel7 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 5 - M5-QP | Round of 32 | 16.88 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B28 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 3.13 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B21 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 4.69 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B7 Jun | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 1.56 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B24 May | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 4.69 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B10 May | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 9.38 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B26 Apr | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 1.56 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B12 Apr | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 4.69 |
| Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4B29 Mar | Not published | Masculinos 6 - Grupo B | - | 4.69 |
Next points to expire
gross estimate; replacement results may reduce the loss| When | Tournament | Leaves ledger | Gross balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 203d29 Mar | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −4.69 | 56.31 |
| 217d12 Apr | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −4.69 | 51.62 |
| 231d26 Apr | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −1.56 | 50.06 |
| 245d10 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −9.38 | 40.68 |
| 259d24 May | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −4.69 | 35.99 |
| 273d7 Jun | II Open WOW PadelMasculinos 5 - M5-QP · Round of 32 | −16.88 | 19.11 |
| 273d7 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −1.56 | 17.55 |
| 287d21 Jun | I Open Carregado by AXIANSMasculinos 5 - M5-QP · Round of 16 | −9.75 | 7.8 |
| 287d21 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −4.69 | 3.11 |
| 294d28 Jun | Liga Mudum 2026 - Fase Regular - Absolutos - Zona 4BMasculinos 6 - Grupo B · - | −3.13 | 0 |
Updated 1 Sept · FPP / TieSports
Sources: FPP / TieSports and public Padel Federado publications · missing fields are not inferred